浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.广州中医药大学第二附属医院(广东省中医院)中医药标准化重点研究室(广东 广州 510120)
2.省部共建中医湿证国家重点实验室(广东 广州 510120)
3.广东省中医药防治难治性慢病重点实验室(广东 广州 510120)
4.重庆中医药学院针灸推拿学院(重庆 402760)
5.中医证候全国重点实验室(广东 广州 510120)
谢秀丽,女,博士,副主任医师,主要从事中医药防治皮肤病的临床研究工作
卢传坚,教授,博士研究生导师;E-mail:lcj@gzucm.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2024-11-10,
收稿日期:2024-04-17,
移动端阅览
谢秀丽,罗亚,李慧,等.基于文献研究及德尔菲法的寻常型银屑病肝气郁结证诊断标准的建立[J].上海中医药杂志,2024,58(11):13-20.
XIE Xiuli,LUO Ya,LI Hui,et al.Establishment of diagnostic criteria for liver qi stagnation syndrome in psoriasis vulgaris based on literature review and Delphi method[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,58(11):13-20.
谢秀丽,罗亚,李慧,等.基于文献研究及德尔菲法的寻常型银屑病肝气郁结证诊断标准的建立[J].上海中医药杂志,2024,58(11):13-20. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2024.2404081.
XIE Xiuli,LUO Ya,LI Hui,et al.Establishment of diagnostic criteria for liver qi stagnation syndrome in psoriasis vulgaris based on literature review and Delphi method[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,58(11):13-20. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2024.2404081.
目的
2
调查专家对寻常型银屑病肝气郁结证的证候诊断经验,筛选该证候的诊断指标,评价其重要性,形成本病证候诊断标准。
方法
2
在文献研究的基础上,通过德尔菲法对全国32位专家进行4轮问卷调查,分析专家意见集中程度及协调程度,第4轮根据权重将各诊断指标分为主症及次症,形成肝气郁结证诊断标准。
结果
2
基于文献研究,共有27个证候诊断备选条目进入备选条目池。根据专家意见集中程度、协调程度对各证候诊断指标进行筛选,形成诊断指标19个,经同类合并,形成主症3个、次症7个。专家认可度较高的诊断标准判断条件选项为2个。
结论
2
专家的积极程度和专业程度较高,意见可信度较高,且协调程度较高。经过4轮调查,形成寻常型银屑病肝气郁结证的诊断标准。
Objective
2
To investigate the diagnostic experience of experts in identifying the syndrome of liver qi stagnation in psoriasis vulgaris, select diagnostic indicators for this syndrome, evaluate their importance, and establish diagnostic criteria for liver qi stagnation syndrome in psoriasis vulgaris.
Methods
2
Based on literature research, a four-round Delphi survey was conducted with 32 national experts, analyzing the concentration and coordination of expert opinions. In the fourth round, diagnostic indicators were categorized as primary or secondary symptoms based on their weighted importance to form the diagnostic criteria for liver qi stagnation syndrome.
Results
2
Based on literature research, 27 potential diagnostic entries for the syndrome were initially identified. Based on the concentration and coordination of expert opinions, 19 diagnostic indicators were finalized and categorized into 3 primary and 7 secondary symptoms. There were two diagnostic criteria with high expert recognition.
Conclusions
2
The enthusiasm and professionalism of the experts were high, credibility of opinions was strong, and the level of coordination was substantial. After four rounds of surveys, diagnostic criteria for liver qi stagnation syndrome in psoriasis vulgaris were established.
银屑病中医证候肝气郁结证诊断标准德尔菲法中医标准化
psoriasis vulgaristraditional Chinese medicine syndromeliver qi stagnation syndromediagnostic criteriaDelphi methodtraditional Chinese medicine standardization
中华医学会皮肤性病学分会银屑病专业委员会.中国银屑病诊疗指南(2023版)[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2023, 56(7): 573-625.
刘欣,朱圣杰,严格,等.从体液代谢论汗法治疗银屑病的现代机制研究[J].上海中医药杂志, 2022, 56(6): 17-22.
卢传坚,曾召,谢秀丽,等.1979-2010年寻常型银屑病文献证候分布情况分析[J].中医杂志, 2012, 53(11): 959-961.
谢秀丽,卢传坚,姚丹霓.基于德尔菲法的寻常型银屑病常见证候诊断指标研究[J].中医杂志, 2015, 56(16): 1409-1413.
谢秀丽.寻常型银屑病中医证候诊断标准研究[D].广州:广州中医药大学, 2015.
谢秀丽,卢传坚,罗亚.基于德尔菲法的寻常型银屑病脾虚湿瘀证诊断标准的建立[J].广州中医药大学学报, 2021, 38(7): 1506-1513.
广东省质量技术监督局.寻常型银屑病中医证候诊断规范:DB44/T 2120—2018[S]. 广东: 广东省标准化研究院, 2018.
刘爱民.寻常性银屑病辨证新体系及其思考[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志, 2014, 28(5): 519-520.
李咏梅,马绍尧,冯国强,等.从肝论治银屑病495例疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志, 2007, 17(12): 776-777.
盖乔.从“肝”论治寻常型银屑病的临床疗效研究[D]. 济南:山东中医药大学, 2016.
张兆洲,王炎.聚焦中医情志致病理论:中医药调节情志应激防治恶性肿瘤复发转移的优势与展望[J].上海中医药杂志, 2023, 57(6): 1-5.
国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.中医临床诊疗术语 第2部分:证候:GB/T 16751.2—2021[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2021.
全国科学技术名词审定委员会.中医药学名词[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2005: 20-130.
李灿东.中医诊断学[M]. 新世纪4版. 北京:中国中医药出版社, 2016: 10-90.
曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用[M]. 北京:北京医科大学协和医科大学联合出版社, 1996: 255-258.
JOHN D. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point,7-point and 10-point scales[J].Int J Market Res, 2008, 50(1): 61-77.
吴崇胜,陈家旭,胡立胜. Delphi法建立中医证候诊断标准中权重系数确定法新探——双百分法[J].中医杂志, 2006, 12(4): 254-255.
李良伟.社会研究的统计应用[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2001: 45.
中华中医药学会. 基于病证结合的中医证临床诊断标准研制与应用规范:T/CACM 1336—2020[S]. 北京:中华中医药学会, 2020.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
0
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构