1.上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院(上海 200437)
2.上海中医药大学(上海 201203)
周小翠,硕士,主治医师,主要从事中西医结合治疗恶性肿瘤临床与研究工作
谢国群,副主任医师;E-mail:guoqun_shihting@163.com
扫 描 看 全 文
周小翠,王立玉,季锋,等.揿针联合阿片类镇痛药物治疗中重度癌性疼痛的临床疗效及对血清β⁃内啡肽、P物质水平的影响[J].上海中医药杂志,2023,57(1):71-75.
ZHOU Xiaocui,WANG Liyu,JI Feng,et al.Clinical efficacy of press needle combined with opioid analgesics in treating moderate⁃to⁃severe cancer pain and its effect on serum levels of β⁃endorphin and substance P[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,57(1):71-75.
周小翠,王立玉,季锋,等.揿针联合阿片类镇痛药物治疗中重度癌性疼痛的临床疗效及对血清β⁃内啡肽、P物质水平的影响[J].上海中医药杂志,2023,57(1):71-75. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2023.2207092.
ZHOU Xiaocui,WANG Liyu,JI Feng,et al.Clinical efficacy of press needle combined with opioid analgesics in treating moderate⁃to⁃severe cancer pain and its effect on serum levels of β⁃endorphin and substance P[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,57(1):71-75. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2023.2207092.
目的,2,观察揿针联合阿片类镇痛药物治疗中重度癌性疼痛的临床疗效及对血清β-内啡肽、P物质水平的影响。,方法,2,将76例中重度癌性疼痛患者随机分为治疗组、对照组,每组38例。对照组给予常规治疗(包括积极治疗原发病、营养支持、阿片类镇痛药物止痛治疗等),治疗组在常规治疗的基础上加用揿针疗法,连续治疗14 d。观察不良反应的发生情况,比较治疗前后两组患者疼痛数字评分(NRS)、简明疼痛量表(BPI)、卡氏功能状态评分(KPS),以及血清β-内啡肽、P物质水平的变化情况。,结果,2,①试验期间,治疗组脱落4例,对照组脱落3例,最终完成试验者69例,其中治疗组34例、对照组35例。②治疗前后组内比较,治疗组疼痛NRS评分降低、KPS评分升高(,P,<,0.05),对照组疼痛NRS、KPS评分差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05);组间治疗后比较,治疗组疼痛NRS评分低于对照组、KPS评分高于对照组(,P,<,0.05)。③治疗前后组内比较,治疗组BPI中24 h最剧烈疼痛、24 h平均疼痛、目前疼痛、对日常生活影响、对情绪影响、对日常工作影响、对睡眠影响及疼痛影响程度总评分降低(,P,<,0.05),对行走能力影响评分升高(,P,<,0.05),对照组上述指标差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05);组间治疗后比较,上述指标差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。④治疗前后组内比较,两组血清β-内啡肽水平升高、P物质水平降低(,P,<,0.05);组间治疗后比较,治疗组血清P物质水平低于对照组(,P,<,0.05)。⑤治疗组便秘、恶心呕吐发生率及不良反应总发生率低于对照组(,P,<,0.05)。,结论,2,加用揿针对癌性疼痛患者具有更好的临床疗效,可缓解疼痛、改善患者生活质量、降低阿片类镇痛药物的不良反应发生率,其机制可能与调节血清β-内啡肽、P物质表达水平有关。
Objective,2,To observe the clinical efficacy of press needle combined with opioid analgesics in treating moderate-to-severe cancer pain and its effect on serum levels of β-endorphin and substance P.,Methods,2,Seventy-six patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain were randomized into a treatment group (,n,=38) and a control group (,n,=38). Patients in the control group received conventional treatment (including active treatment of primary diseases, nutritional support, and opioid analgesics) while those in the treatment group were treated with press needle in addition to the conventional treatment. The treatment in both groups lasted 14 consecutive days. The incidence of adverse reactions was observed, and the pain numerical rating scale (NRS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and serum levels of β-endorphin and substance P were assessed and compared before and after treatment.,Results,2,①There were 4 drop-outs in the treatment group and 3 drop-outs in the control group during the trial. Finally, 69 patients completed the trial with 34 patients in the treatment group and 35 patients in the control group. ②After treatment, the pain NRS score decreased and KPS score increased in the treatment group (,P,<,0.05), while the differences before and after treatment in pain NRS and KPS scores in the control group were not statistically significant (,P,>,0.05); After treatment, the pain NRS score in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group and the KPS score in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group (,P,<,0.05). ③In the treatment group, the scores of worst pain in last 24 hours, pain on average over the last 24 hours, pain right now, impact on general activity, mood, normal work, sleep, and total score of impact of pain after treatment were lower than those before treatment (,P,<,0.05), and the scores of impact on walking ability increased after treatment (,P,<,0.05), but the differences before and after treatment in the scores of the above items in the control group were not statistically significant (,P,>,0.05); After treatment, the differences between the two groups in the scores of the above items were not statistically significant (,P,>,0.05). ④After treatment, the serum level of β-endorphin increased and that of substance P decreased in both groups (,P,<,0.05); After treatment, the serum level of substance P in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (,P,<,0.05). ⑤The incidence of constipation, nausea and vomiting and the total incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group (,P,<,0.05).,Conclusions,2,Additional use of press needle has a better clinical effect on patients with cancer pain as it can relieve pain, improve patient’s quality of life, and reduce adverse reactions due to opioid analgesics. The mechanism may be related to the regulation of serum β-endorphin and substance P expression levels.
癌性疼痛揿针阿片类药物β-内啡肽中西医结合疗法不良反应临床试验
cancer painpress needleopioidsβ-endorphinintegrated traditional Chinese and western medicine therapyadverse reactionclinical trial
周迪,董昌盛,许玲,等. 龙藤通络酒剂外用联合三阶梯止痛药物治疗癌性疼痛的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药杂志,2020, 54(11): 38-42.
MADEIRA N, ALBUQUERQUE E, SANTOS T, et al. Death ideation in cancer patients: contributing factors[J]. J Psychosoc Oncol, 2011, 29(6): 636-642.
王雪梅,于红刚. 癌性疼痛的综合治疗研究进展[J]. 癌症进展,2019, 17(21): 2502-2504,2508.
孙唯,张子丽. 耳穴揿针联合西药治疗癌性疼痛的临床观察[J]. 按摩与康复医学,2016, 7(9): 24-25.
孙燕,石远凯. 临床肿瘤内科手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2009: 258.
SWARM R A, PAICE J A, ANGHELESCU D L, et al. Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019, 17(8): 977-1007.
DAUT R L, CLEELAND C S, FLANERY R C. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases[J]. Pain, 1983, 17:197-210.
车薛华,梁伟民. NCCN成人癌性疼痛控制指南解读[J]. 中国医药指南,2010,8(13):84-85.
COYNE K S, SEXTON C, LOCASALE R J, et al. Opioid-induced constipation among a convenience sample of patients with cancer pain[J]. Front Oncol, 2016, 6: 131.
VAN DEN BEUKEN-VAN EVERDINGEN M H, HOCHSTENBACH L M, JOOSTEN E A, et al. Update on prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2016, 51(6): 1070-1090.
HANS G, DESEURE K, ROBERT D, et al. Neurosensory changes in a human model of endothelin-1 induced pain: a behavioral study[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2007, 18(2): 117-121.
ZUBRZYCKA M, JANECKA A. Effect of tooth pulp and periaqueductal central gray electrical stimulation on β-endorphin release into the fluid perfusing the cerebral ventricles in rats[J]. Brain Res, 2011, 1405: 15-22.
MYSTAKIDOU K, BEFON S, HONDROS K, et al. Continuous subcutaneous administration of high-dose salmon calcitonin in bone metastasis: pain control and beta-endorphin plasma levels[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1999, 18(5): 323-330.
EL-SHEIKH N, BOSWELL M V. Plasma Beta-endorphin levels before and after relief of cancer pain[J]. Pain Physician, 2004, 7(1): 67-70.
LOH H H, TSENG L F, WEI E, et al. Beta-endorphin is a potent analgesic agent[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1976, 73(8): 2895-2898.
NICOLL R A, SCHENKER C, LEEMAN S E. Substance P as a transmitter candidate[J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 1980, 3: 227-268.
DUBNER R, BENNETT G J. Spinal and trigeminal mechanisms of nociception[J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 1983, 6: 381-418.
司马蕾,厉建春,蔡淑呈,等. P物质和降钙素基因相关肽在骨癌性疼痛-吗啡耐受模型中的表达[J]. 中国癌症杂志,2012, 22(8): 561-565.
王曼,刘传波,卫月,等. 中医外治法在癌性疼痛治疗中的应用及思考[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2020, 35(12): 6244-6247.
王静,宋娜,徐宏建,等. 癌性疼痛规范化治疗联合中医外治缓解癌性疼痛临床观察[J]. 实用中医药杂志,2019, 35(9): 1075-1076.
朱璇璇. 揿针围刺治疗急性期带状疱疹患者的疗效观察及护理[J]. 中国临床护理,2019, 11(4): 350-353.
宋雪,杨大伟,张立源,等. 揿针治疗颈椎病颈痛的临床观察[J]. 世界中西医结合杂志,2017, 12(2): 262-265.
程璐. 揿针埋针对肺癌患者术后疼痛的效果研究[J]. 中外女性健康研究,2019(24): 109, 145.
魏清风,胡丹,王伟云,等. 癌性疼痛膏联合揿针治理对中重度癌性疼痛的疗效研究[J]. 赣南医学院学报,2019, 39(11): 1129-1132, 1136.
杨玉平,沈翠珍. 揿针疗法合并穴位贴敷治疗癌性疼痛三阶梯止痛患者效果观察[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志,2019,26(S1):163,165.
0
浏览量
385
下载量
1
CSCD
4
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构