1.上海中医药大学中医方证信息研究中心(上海 201203)
2.上海中医药大学科技人文研究院(上海 201203)
3.上海中医药大学交叉科学研究院(上海 201203)
李明,男,博士,副研究员,硕士研究生导师,主要从事中医标准、中医方证、数据挖掘等的研究工作
朱邦贤,教授,博士研究生导师;E-mail:zbx5100@hotmail.com
严世芸,上海中医药大学终身教授,博士研究生导师;E-mail:yansy514@126.com
扫 描 看 全 文
李明,周强,娄月丽,等.《中医病证分类与代码:GB/T 15657—2021》实施效果初步评价[J].上海中医药杂志,2022,56(11):1-6.
LI Ming,ZHOU Qiang,LOU Yueli,et al.Preliminary evaluation on implementation effect of Classification and Codes of Diseases and Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine (GB/T 15657—2021)[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,56(11):1-6.
李明,周强,娄月丽,等.《中医病证分类与代码:GB/T 15657—2021》实施效果初步评价[J].上海中医药杂志,2022,56(11):1-6. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2022.2205031.
LI Ming,ZHOU Qiang,LOU Yueli,et al.Preliminary evaluation on implementation effect of Classification and Codes of Diseases and Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine (GB/T 15657—2021)[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,56(11):1-6. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2022.2205031.
目的,2,评价国家标准《中医病证分类与代码:GB/T 15657—2021》在全国的实施效果以及实施过程中存在的问题,为进一步推广该标准的实施提供技术依据和建议。,方法,2,2021年11月至12月就上海、江苏、浙江等27个省及直辖市的中医医疗机构对《中医病证分类与代码:GB/T 15657—2021》标准的实施、应用、培训等情况进行问卷调查和文献分析。,结果,2,本次调查共发放问卷834份,回收有效问卷834份,覆盖全国242家医院,其中三级医院73.02%,二级医院26.02%。95.80%参与调研者反馈本医院已经开始使用该标准;81.18%参与调研者认为该标准的术语更加实用;79.86%参与调研者认为该标准的分类更加实用;84.65%参与调研者认为实施该标准后医生的诊断更加规范、准确;88.25%参与调研者认为本版标准满足了临床诊断的需求。至2021年12月,国家中医药管理局、国家卫生健康委员会和国家医疗保障局均已发文使用《中医病证分类与代码:GB/T 15657—2021》。,结论,2,《中医病证分类与代码:GB/T 15657—2021》标准的分类与术语科学合理,标准的新旧版本过渡顺利,实施新版标准后医生的诊断更加规范、准确。建议进一步完善新版标准的宣传贯彻、监测评估、反馈机制等方面的制度建设。
Objective,2,To evaluate the implementation effect of the national standard—,Classification and Codes of Diseases and Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine, (GB/T 15657—2021)—in China and discuss the problems in its implementation for the purpose of providing technical basis and suggestions for further promoting the implementation of the standard.,Methods,2,A questionnaire survey was conducted from November to December 2021 on the implementation, application, and training of the new national standard—,Classification and Codes of Diseases and Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine, (GB/T 15657—2021)—in the TCM institutions of 27 provinces and municipalities directly under the central government, including Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang. Literature analysis was also performed.,Results,2,In this survey, 834 questionnaires were distributed and 834 valid questionnaires were returned, covering 242 hospitals in China, among which 73.02% were tertiary hospitals and 26.02% were secondary hospitals. According to the survey, 95.80% of the respondents reported that their hospitals had started to use the standard; 81.18% of the respondents believed that the terminology of the standard was more practical; 79.86% of the respondents thought that the classification of this standard was more practical; 84.65% of the respondents held that the doctors’ diagnosis had become more standard and accurate since the implementation of this standard; and 88.25% of the respondents believed that this edition of the standard met the needs of clinical diagnosis. By December 2021, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, and National Healthcare Security Administration had all issued a document to announce the use of ,Classification and Codes of Diseases and Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine, (GB/T 15657—2021).,Conclusion,2,Classification and Codes of Diseases and Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine, (GB/T 15657—2021) has reasonable classification criteria and scientific terminology, which transits smoothly from the previous edition, and its implementation facilitates doctors to make more standard and accurate diagnosis. It is recommended to further improve the system construction of the new edition of the standard in terms of publicity and implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and feedback mechanism.
《中医病证分类与代码》新版标准化疾病分类中医证候术语研究实施效果评价
Classification and Codes of Diseases and Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicinenew editionstandardizationclassification of diseasestraditional Chinese medicine syndrometerminology studyimplementation effect evaluation
国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会. 中医病证分类与代码:GB/T 15657—2021[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2021:1.
国家中医药管理局. 国家中医药管理局 国家卫生健康委员会关于印发《中医病证分类与代码》和《中医临床诊疗术语》的通知[EB/OL].(2020-11-23)[2021-4-20].http://yzs.satcm.gov.cn/zhengcewen jian/2020-11-23/18461.htmlhttp://yzs.satcm.gov.cn/zhengcewenjian/2020-11-23/18461.html.
周强,李明,董全伟,等.《国际疾病分类第十一次修订本(ICD-11)》传统医学章节与新版中医国家标准的比较研究[J]. 上海中医药杂志,2021, 55(5): 1-6,23.
李明,周强,董全伟,等. 形制之变(一)——新旧中医国家标准疾病部分异同解读[J].上海中医药杂志,2021, 55(2): 1-8.
李明,周强,董全伟,等. 形制之变(二)——新旧中医国家标准证候部分异同解读[J].上海中医药杂志,2021, 55(3): 1-7.
李明,周强,董全伟,等. 形制之变(三)——新旧中医国家标准治法部分异同解读[J].上海中医药杂志,2021, 55(4): 1-5.
国家医疗保障局. 国家医疗保障局办公室 国家中医药管理局办公室关于做好医保版中医病证分类与代码更新工作的通知[EB/OL].(2021-12-28)[2022-3-2]. http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2021/12/28/art_37_7609.htmlhttp://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2021/12/28/art_37_7609.html.
国家中医药管理局. 国家中医药管理局办公室关于启动2021年度二级和三级公立中医医院绩效考核有关工作的通知[EB/OL].(2020-6-8)[2022-3-2]. http://yzs.satcm.gov.cn/gongzuodongtai/2021-06-08/21975.htmlhttp://yzs.satcm.gov.cn/gongzuodongtai/2021-06-08/21975.html.
朱邦贤,严世芸,周强,等. 神魂之铸——论新版中医国家标准“病证理法相贯”规则体系的建立[J/OL]. 上海中医药杂志,2021[2022-03-16]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1276.r.20211202. 1148.001.htmlhttps://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1276.r.20211202.1148.001.html.
郭志武,赖伏虎,杨业春,等.《中医病证分类与代码》修订版编码改进方案研究[J]. 中国病案,2021, 22(11): 43-46.
李明,周强,罗晓兰,等. 中医症状术语标准及其分类体系研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2021, 36(8): 4838-4842.
李明,周强,杨丽娜,等. 中医疾病的命名规则研究[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志,2022, 28(5): 669-672.
国家中医药管理局. 国家中医药管理局解读《“十四五”中医药发展规划》[EB/OL].(2021-3-29)[2022-5-4]. http://www.satcm.gov.cn/guicaisi/zhengcewenjian/2022-03-29/25695.htmlhttp://www.satcm.gov.cn/guicaisi/zhengcewenjian/2022-03-29/25695.html.
国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发2021年国家医疗质量安全改进目标的通知[EB/OL].(2021-2-20)[2022-5-4]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7657/202102/8c53313 663284a7ba146648509538ee2.shtmlhttp://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7657/202102/8c53313663284a7ba146648509538ee2.shtml.
0
浏览量
251
下载量
0
CSCD
0
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构