1.上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院肿瘤一科(上海 200437)
2.同济大学附属第十人民医院肿瘤科(上海 200072)
姚丽秋,女,硕士,住院医师,主要从事中医防治消化道肿瘤临床与研究工作
施俊,副主任医师,硕士研究生导师; E-mail:shijundoctor@163.com
扫 描 看 全 文
姚丽秋,刘辉,王筱等.龙藤通络方外用治疗奥沙利铂诱导的周围神经病变的临床研究[J].上海中医药杂志,2022,56(02):38-44.
YAO Liqiu,LIU Hui,WANG Xiao,et al.Clinical study on the external application of Longteng Tongluo Decoction in the treatment of oxaliplatin⁃induced peripheral neuropathy[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,56(02):38-44.
姚丽秋,刘辉,王筱等.龙藤通络方外用治疗奥沙利铂诱导的周围神经病变的临床研究[J].上海中医药杂志,2022,56(02):38-44. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2022.2108121.
YAO Liqiu,LIU Hui,WANG Xiao,et al.Clinical study on the external application of Longteng Tongluo Decoction in the treatment of oxaliplatin⁃induced peripheral neuropathy[J].Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,56(02):38-44. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2022.2108121.
目的,2,观察龙藤通络方外用治疗奥沙利铂诱导的周围神经病变(OIPN)的临床疗效。,方法,2,将120例OIPN患者随机分为治疗组、安慰剂组、对照组,每组40例;治疗组予龙藤通络方外用,安慰剂组予龙藤通络方安慰剂外用,对照组予甲钴胺片口服,各组疗程均为28 d。观察临床疗效,比较周围神经毒性分级、生存质量(FACT/GOG-Ntx量表评分、EORTC QOL C30 v3.0量表评分)、中医证候评分、血清神经生长因子(NGF)水平的变化情况,同时进行安全性评价。,结果,2,①治疗组、安慰剂组共脱落或剔除4例,对照组脱落1例,最终完成试验者治疗组、安慰剂组各36例,对照组39例。②周围神经毒性疗效:治疗组、安慰剂组、对照组总有效率分别为72.22%、16.67%、35.90%,治疗组疗效优于安慰剂组和对照组(,P,<,0.01);安慰剂组、对照组疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。中医证候疗效:治疗组、安慰剂组、对照组总有效率分别为72.22%、36.11%、33.33%,治疗组疗效优于安慰剂组和对照组(,P,<,0.01);安慰剂组、对照组疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。③治疗组患者治疗7 d后周围神经毒性分级开始得到改善(,P,<,0.05),安慰剂组患者治疗21 d后周围神经毒性分级开始得到改善(,P,<,0.05),对照组患者治疗后周围神经毒性分级开始得到改善(,P,<,0.05)。治疗7 d、14 d时组间比较,各组周围神经毒性分级情况差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05);治疗21 d时组间比较,治疗组周围神经毒性分级情况优于安慰剂组(,P,<,0.05),治疗组与对照组、对照组与安慰剂组比较,周围神经毒性分级情况差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05);治疗后组间比较,治疗组周围神经毒性分级情况优于安慰剂组、对照组(,P,<,0.01),安慰剂组与对照组比较,周围神经毒性分级情况差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。④治疗前后组内比较,治疗组心悸气短、神疲乏力、自汗、头晕眼花、失眠健忘、手足麻木积分减少(,P,<,0.05),安慰剂组心悸气短、失眠健忘积分减少(,P,<,0.05),对照组手足麻木积分减少(,P,<,0.05)。治疗后组间比较,各组头晕眼花、失眠健忘积分未见明显差异(,P,>,0.05);治疗组心悸气短、自汗、手足麻木积分少于对照组(,P,<,0.05,,P,<,0.01),神疲乏力、手足麻木积分少于安慰剂组(,P,<,0.05,,P,<,0.01);安慰剂组心悸气短积分少于对照组(,P,<,0.01)。⑤治疗前后组内比较,各组FACT/GOG-Ntx量表评分较治疗前下降(,P,<,0.05)。治疗后组间比较,治疗组FACT/GOG-Ntx量表评分低于对照组、安慰剂组(,P,<,0.05,,P,<,0.01),对照组与安慰剂组比较,FACT/GOG-Ntx量表评分差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。⑥治疗前后组内比较,治疗组躯体、角色、情绪、认知、社会功能及总健康状况评分升高(,P,<,0.05),安慰剂组躯体、角色、认知功能及总健康状况评分升高(,P,<,0.05),对照组仅角色功能、总健康状况评分升高(,P,<,0.05)。组间治疗后比较,各组认知、社会功能评分差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05);治疗组情绪功能、总健康状况、躯体功能、角色功能评分高于安慰剂组(,P,<,0.05,,P,<,0.01),角色功能、总健康状况评分高于对照组(,P,<,0.05,,P,<,0.01);对照组与安慰剂组比较,EORTC QOL C30 v3.0量表各分项评分差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。⑦治疗前后各组内、组间比较,血清NGF水平差异均无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。,结论,2,龙藤通络方能有效改善OIPN的临床症状,提高患者的生存质量,且安全性较好。
Objective,2,To observe the clinical efficacy of external application of Longteng Tongluo Decoction (LTD) in the treatment of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN).,Methods,2,Totally 120 patients with OIPN were randomly divided into a treatment group, a placebo group and a control group, with 40 cases in each group. The treatment group was administered with LTD for external application, the placebo group was administered with LTD placebo for external application, and the control group was administered with methylcobalt for oral administration. The treatment lasted 28 days in each group. The clinical efficacy was observed, and the changes in peripheral neurotoxicity grading, quality of survival (FACT/GOG-Ntx scale score, EORTC QOL C30 v3.0 scale score), TCM syndrome scores and serum nerve growth factor (NGF) levels were compared, and safety evaluation was also performed.,Results,2,①In the treatment group and placebo group 4 cases dropped out or were removed, and there was 1 drop-out case in the control group. Finally, 36 cases each in the treatment group and placebo group and 39 cases in the control group completed the trial. ②On peripheral neurotoxicity grading: the total effective rates of the treatment group, placebo group and control group were 72.22%, 16.67% and 35.90%, respectively. The efficacy of the treatment group was better than that of the placebo group and control group (,P,<,0.01). There was no significant difference in the efficacy between the placebo group and the control group ,(P,>,0.05). On TCM syndrome scores: the total effective rates of the treatment group, placebo group and control group were 72.22%, 36.11% and 33.33%, respectively, and the efficacy of the treatment group was better than that of the placebo group and control group (,P,<,0.01). There was no significant difference in the efficacy between the placebo group and the control group ,(P,>,0.05). ③The improvement in the peripheral neurotoxicity grading was observed after 7 days of treatment in the treatment group (,P,<,0.05), after 21 days of treatment in the placebo group (,P,<,0.05), and after treatment in the control group (,P,<,0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in peripheral neurotoxicity grading among three groups after 7 days and 14 days of treatment (,P,>,0.05). After 21 days of treatment, the peripheral neurotoxicity grading of the treatment group was better than that of the placebo group (,P,<,0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the peripheral neurotoxicity grading between the treatment group and the control group, and between the control group and the placebo group (,P,>,0.05). After 28 days of treatment, the peripheral neurotoxicity grading of the treatment group was better than that of the placebo group and the control group (,P,<,0.01), and there was no statistically significant difference in the peripheral neurotoxicity grading between the placebo group and the control group (,P,>,0.05).④According to the intra-group comparison before and after treatment, the scores of palpitation and shortness of breath, fatigue, spontaneous sweating, dizziness, insomnia and forgetfulness, and numbness of hands and feet decreased in the treatment group (,P,<,0.05), the scores of palpitation and shortness of breath, insomnia and forgetfulness dropped in the placebo group (,P,<,0.05), the scores of numbness of hands and feet decreased in the control group (,P,<,0.05). According to the inter-group comparison after treatment, no significant differences were found in the scores of dizziness, insomnia and forgetfulness among the three groups (,P,>,0.05); the scores of palpitation and shortness of breath, spontaneous sweating and numbness of hands and feet in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group (,P,<,0.05, ,P,<,0.01), and the scores of fatigue and numbness of hands and feet in the treatment group were lower than those in the placebo group (,P,<,0.05, ,P,<,0.01); and the scores of palpitation and shortness of breath in the placebo group were lower than those in the control group (,P,<,0.01). ⑤The intra-group comparison before and after treatment showed that the FACT/GOG-Ntx scale scores decreased in each group (,P,<,0.05). After treatment, the FACT/GOG-Ntx scale scores in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group and placebo group (,P,<,0.05, ,P,<,0.01), and there was no statistically significant difference in the FACT/GOG-Ntx scale scores between the control group and placebo group (,P,>,0.05). ⑥According to the intra-group comparison, the scores of the 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social function) and the total health status scores increased in the treatment group (,P,<,0.05), the scores of physical, role and cognitive function and the total health status scores increased in the placebo group (,P,<,0.05), and only the scores of role function and the total health status scores increased in the control group (P,<,0.05). After treatment, the differences in scores of cognitive function and social function were not statistically significant (,P,>,0.05); the scores of emotional, physical and role function and the total health status scores in the treatment group were higher than those in the placebo group (,P,<,0.05, ,P,<,0.01), and the scores of role function and the total health status scores in the treatment group were higher than those in the control group (,P,<,0.05, ,P,<,0.01). The differences in the scores of each subscale of the EORTC QOL C30 v3.0 scale were not statistically significant between the control group and the placebo group (,P,>,0.05). ⑦The differences in serum NGF levels were not statistically significant when compared within and between groups before and after treatment (,P,>,0.05).,Conclusion,2,Longteng Tongluo Decoction can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of OIPN and the quality of survival of patients with better safety.
肿瘤化疗奥沙利铂周围神经病变龙藤通络方中医外治临床试验
tumorchemotherapyoxaliplatinperipheral neuropathyLongteng Tongluo Decoctionexternal treatment of traditional Chinese Medicineclinical trial
邹晓玲,陈盼,谢美,等. 化疗所致外周神经毒性的中西医治疗进展[J]. 湖南中医杂志,2018, 34(3): 200-202.
DENG B, JIA L, CHENG Z. Radix astragali-based Chinese herbal medicine for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2016, 2016: 2421876[2021-08-01]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067479/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067479/.
STAFF N P, GRISOLD A, GRISOLD W, et al. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A current review[J]. Ann Neurol, 2017, 81(6): 772-781.
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03[EB/OL]. (2010-06-14)[2021-08-01]. http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htmhttp://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm.
国家药品监督管理局. 中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002.
GRISOLD W, CAVALETTI G, WINDEBANK A J. Peripheral neuropathies from chemotherapeutics and targeted agents: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2012, 14(Suppl 4): iv45-iv54.
CHENG H L, LOPEZ V, LAM S C, et al. Psychometric testing of the functional assessment of cancer therapy/gynecologic oncology group-neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) subscale in a longitudinal study of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2020, 18(1): 246.
FAYERS P, BOTTOMLEY A. Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European organisation for research and treatment of cancer [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2002(Suppl 4): S125-S133.
邱彩锋,赵继军. QLQ-C30的应用及计分方法[J]. 国外医学(护理学分册),2005, 24(11): 53-55.
COLVIN L A. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: where are we now?[J]. Pain, 2019, 160 (Suppl 1): S1-S10.
马骏,霍介格. 化疗所致周围神经病变的临床研究现状[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2019, 27(13): 2415-2420.
FLATTERS S J L, DOUGHERTY P M, COLVIN L A. Clinical and preclinical perspectives on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): a narrative review[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2017, 119(4): 737-749.
ZAJĄCZKOWSKA R, KOCOT-KĘPSKA M, LEPPERT W, et al. Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(6): 1451.
STAFF N P, GRISOLD A, GRISOLD W,et al. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A current review[J]. Ann Neurol, 2017, 81(6): 772-781.
KANG L, TIAN Y, XU S, et al. Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: clinical features, mechanisms, prevention and treatment[J]. J Neurol, 2021, 268(9): 3269-3282.
SERENO M, GUTIÉRREZ-GUTIÉRREZ G, GÓMEZ-RAPOSO C, et al. Oxaliplatin induced-neuropathy in digestive tumors[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2014, 89(1): 166-178.
CAVALETTI G, MARMIROLI P. Management of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2020, 12(6):1370.
刘素,张侠. 奥沙利铂神经毒性机制及基因多态性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2015, 9(9): 1685-1689.
师悦,李崇慧. 化疗药所致周围神经毒性中西医治疗进展[J]. 中医药临床杂志,2017, 29(3): 327-330.
陈淼,张庆乾,余志红,等. 化疗所致周围神经病变外治法概述[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2019, 34(10): 4750-4753.
廖天华,余昭胜,刘俊波,等. 对常见化疗药物的中药药性探析[J]. 广西中医药,2013, 36(2): 40-41.
邓博,贾立群,程志强,等. 鸡血藤干预奥沙利铂致周围神经毒性的Meta分析[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2016, 34(1): 20-26.
蔡卓亚,周自桂,李萍,等. 伸筋草化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中草药,2015, 46(2): 297-304.
FENG L, LIU W K, DENG L, et al. Clinical efficacy of aconitum-containing traditional Chinese medicine for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain[J]. Am J Chin Med, 2014, 42(1): 109-117.
罗燕平,戚微岩,吴小东,等. 老鹳草素的研究进展[J]. 药物生物技术,2016, 23(3): 279-282.
沈丽,王妍. 神经生长因子的研究及应用进展[J]. 微生物学免疫学进展,2015, 43(6): 48-52.
PITTENGER G, VINIK A. Nerve growth factor and diabetic neuropathy[J]. Exp Diabesity Res, 2003, 4(4): 271-285.
CAVALETTI G, BOGLIUN G, MARZORATI L, et al. Early predictors of peripheral neurotoxicity in cisplatin and paclitaxel combination chemotherapy[J]. Ann Oncol, 2004 , 15(9): 1439-1442.
0
浏览量
354
下载量
0
CSCD
5
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构