1.上海中医药大学附属龙华医院(上海 200032)
2.上海市青浦区中医医院(上海 201700)
3.上海市光华中西医结合医院(上海 200052)
4.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院黄浦分院(上海 200011)
5.上海市闵行区中医医院(上海 201103)
沈琪幸,女,硕士,主治医师,主要从事脊柱退行性疾病的中医临床研究工作
莫文,主任医师,教授,博士研究生导师;E-mail:mw2218@126.com
扫 描 看 全 文
沈琪幸, 许金海, 夏烨, 等. 中药辨证论治结合骶管封闭术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的多中心随机对照临床研究[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2021,55(8):48-53.
Qixing SHEN, Jinhai XU, Ye XIA, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled clinical study on treatment of lumbar disc herniation with traditional Chinese herbal medicine syndrome differentiation combined with sacral canal block[J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021,55(8):48-53.
沈琪幸, 许金海, 夏烨, 等. 中药辨证论治结合骶管封闭术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的多中心随机对照临床研究[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2021,55(8):48-53. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2021.2105026.
Qixing SHEN, Jinhai XU, Ye XIA, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled clinical study on treatment of lumbar disc herniation with traditional Chinese herbal medicine syndrome differentiation combined with sacral canal block[J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021,55(8):48-53. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2021.2105026.
目的,2,观察中药辨证论治(“益气化瘀补肾法”中药辨证内服外敷)结合骶管封闭术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。,方法,2,将5个分中心收集的430例病例随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组215例。治疗组采用“益气化瘀补肾法”中药辨证内服外敷结合骶管封闭术,对照组采用常规西药治疗。两组疗程均为2周,随访4周,观察用药安全性,比较局部疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科学会(JOA)腰椎治疗评分以及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)问卷评分的变化情况。,结果,2,①试验期间,治疗组脱落5例,对照组脱落5例;最终完成试验者420例,其中治疗组210例,对照组210例。②治疗后各时间点与治疗前组内比较,两组局部疼痛VAS评分差异均有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05),且其评分逐渐降低;组间局部疼痛VAS评分在治疗1周、治疗2周时比较,治疗组均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05);组间局部疼痛VAS评分在随访4周时比较,差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05),且非劣效检验合格。③治疗后各时间点与治疗前组内比较,两组JOA腰椎治疗评分差异均有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05),且其评分逐渐升高;组间JOA腰椎治疗评分在治疗1周、治疗2周时比较,治疗组均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05);组间JOA腰椎治疗评分在随访4周时比较,差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05),且非劣效检验合格。④治疗后各时间点与治疗前组内比较,两组ODI问卷评分差异均有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05),且其评分逐渐降低;组间ODI问卷评分在治疗2周时比较,治疗组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05);组间ODI问卷评分在随访4周时比较,差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。⑤两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05)。,结论,2,相比常规西药治疗,“益气化瘀补肾法”中药辨证内服外敷结合骶管封闭术具有早期疗效优势,可更快地减轻患者疼痛症状及缓解腰椎功能障碍;而在随访期(中期)疗效方面,治疗组也不劣于对照组。
Objective,2,To evaluate the clinical effect of traditional Chinese herbal medicine (TCHM) treatment based on syndrome differentiation (oral administration and external application of TCHM based on syndrome differentiation with "Yiqi Huayu Bushen method" ) combined with sacral canal block on lumbar disc herniation.,Methods,2,A total of 430 cases collected from 5 sub-centers were randomly divided into treatment group (,n,=215) and control group (,n,=215). The treatment group was given oral administration and external application of TCHM based on syndrome differentiation with "Yiqi Huayu Bushen method" combined with sacral canal block technique, while the control group was administered with conventional western medicine treatment. The course of treatment lasted 2 weeks, and each case was followed up for 4 weeks to observe the safety of medication, and compare the changes of local pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Society (JOA) lumbar score and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) score before and after treatment.,Results,2,①During the trial, there were 5 drop-out cases in the treatment group and 5 drop-out cases in the control group. Finally, 420 cases completed the trial, including 210 cases in the treatment group and 210 cases in the control group. ②According to the intra-group comparisons before treatment and at different time points after treatment, the differences in the VAS scores of local pain were statistically significant in both groups (,P,<,0.05), and the VAS scores gradually decreased at different time points after treatment. The VAS score of local pain in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group after 1 week and 2 weeks of treatment respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (,P,<,0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score of local pain between groups at 4 weeks of follow-ups (,P,>,0.05), and the non-inferiority test was qualified. ③According to the intra-group comparisons before treatment and at different time points after treatment, the differences in the JOA lumbar scores were statistically significant in both groups (,P,<,0.05), and the JOA lumbar scores gradually increased at different time points after treatment. The JOA lumbar score in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group after 1 week and 2 weeks of treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (,P,<,0.05). There was no significant difference in JOA lumbar score between groups at 4 weeks of follow-ups (,P,>,0.05), and the non-inferiority test was qualified. ④According to the intra-group comparisons before treatment and at different time points after treatment, the differences in the ODI scores were statistically significant in both groups (,P,<,0.05), and the ODI scores gradually decreased at different time points after treatment. The ODI scores in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group after 2 weeks of treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (,P,<,0.05). There was no significant difference in ODI scores between groups at 4 weeks of follow-ups (,P,>,0.05). ⑤There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (,P,>,0.05).,Conclusion,2,Compared with conventional western medicine treatment, oral administration and external application of TCHM based on syndrome differentiation with "Yiqi Huayu Bushen method" combined with sacral canal block technique has the advantage of early therapeutic effect, which can relieve pain symptoms and lumbar dysfunction of patients more quickly. In the follow-up period (mid-term), the therapeutic effect of treatment group is not inferior to that of the control group.
腰椎间盘突出症中药辨证论治骶管硬膜外药物注射疗法保守治疗多中心临床试验
lumbar disc herniationtraditional Chinese herbal medicinetreatment based on syndrome differentiationsacral epidural drug injection therapyconservative treatmentmulticenter clinical trial
胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎,等. 实用骨科学[M]. 3版. 北京:人民军医出版社,2004: 1507-1540.
周谋望,岳寿伟,何成奇,等. “腰椎间盘突出症的康复治疗”中国专家共识[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2017, 32(2): 129-135.
伍忠东,游旭旺,李水英. 腰椎间盘突出症的临床分期与治疗方法选择[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报,2007, 31(3): 343-344.
李俊毅,孔赏,马虎升,等. 手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的作用机制研究进展[J]. 中医正骨,2019, 31(4): 40-42.
黄大智,蔡萍,戎宽,等. 中医正骨手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中医正骨,2019, 31(1): 41-42.
王权亮,梁爽. 搓飞针刺手法联合常规针刺手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J]. 中医正骨,2019, 31(3): 9-13.
许金海,莫文,叶洁,等. 施杞教授从痹论治腰椎间盘突出症验案举隅[J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报,2012, 14(9): 74-77.
车玥琛,张哲,车月玫. 腰痛宁胶囊联合塞来昔布治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J]. 现代药物与临床,2019, 34(10): 3123-3126.
龚化阳. 身痛逐瘀汤联合塞来昔布治疗腰间盘突出症/腰肌劳损(瘀血)随机平行对照研究[J]. 实用中医内科杂志,2019, 33(2): 19-21.
国家中医药管理局. 中医病证诊断疗效标准[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社,1994: 201-202.
许金海,王晶,叶洁,等. 益气化瘀补肾法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照临床研究[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化,2013, 15(5): 1074-1080.
强东坤,邓蓉蓉,顾军,等. 脊伸痹通方联合西乐葆治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察[J]. 西部中医药,2018, 31(5): 90-92.
郑青山,孙瑞元,陈志扬. 新药临床非劣性及等效性试验中的例数估计和等效标准[J]. 中国新药杂志,2003, 12(5): 368-371.
KREINER D S, HWANG S W, EASA J E, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy[J]. Spine J, 2014, 14(9): 2273.
UEHARA M, TAKAHASHI J, IKEGAMI S. Values for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in the general elderly population: A Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic resident registry[J/OL]. J Orthop Sci, 2020[2021-02-06]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33309132/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33309132/.
FAIRBANK J C, PYNSENT P B. The Oswestry disability index[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(22): 2940-2952.
雷龙鸣,龙威力. 药罐疗法治疗寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察[J]. 辽宁中医杂志,2017, 44(2): 373-376.
莫伟,许金海,叶洁,等. 腰椎间盘突出症中医治疗方法的研究进展[J]. 中国中医急症,2016, 25(3): 474-476.
王洪伟,李长青,周跃. 腰椎间盘突出症疼痛发生机制的研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2011, 19(7): 568-571.
施杞,王拥军,谢可永,等. 中医骨内科学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 693-697.
许金海,王国栋,沈琪幸,等. 筋痹颗粒治疗神经根型颈椎病的随机、双盲、双模拟、非劣效平行对照临床研究[J]. 上海中医药杂志,2020, 54(2): 55-61.
邢秋娟,王拥军,施杞,等. 益气化瘀补肾法延缓椎间盘衰老的机理探讨[J]. 上海中医药大学学报,2011, 25(3): 62-67.
郑远洪,姜秀高. 骶管硬膜外造影对腰椎间盘突出症诊断及临床应用[J]. 实用放射学杂志,1998, 14(4): 236-237.
0
浏览量
313
下载量
0
CSCD
15
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构