1.上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院消化科(上海 200437)
2.上海中医药大学交叉科学研究院(上海 200032)
3.上海中医药大学基础医学院(上海 201203)
朱俊燃,女,硕士,住院医师,主要从事中西医结合防治消化道肿瘤的临床与基础研究工作
方盛泉,主任医师,硕士研究生导师;E-mail:fsq20032003@163.com
扫 描 看 全 文
朱俊燃, 方盛泉, 陈启龙, 等. 藿苏养胃口服液联合SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2021,55(4):50-54.
Junran ZHU, Shengquan FANG, Qilong CHEN, et al. Clinical observation of Huosu Yangwei Syrup combined with SOX chemotherapy regimen in treating advanced gastric cancer[J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021,55(4):50-54.
朱俊燃, 方盛泉, 陈启龙, 等. 藿苏养胃口服液联合SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2021,55(4):50-54. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2021.2009003.
Junran ZHU, Shengquan FANG, Qilong CHEN, et al. Clinical observation of Huosu Yangwei Syrup combined with SOX chemotherapy regimen in treating advanced gastric cancer[J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021,55(4):50-54. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2021.2009003.
目的,2,观察藿苏养胃口服液联合SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效。,方法,2,将72例晚期胃癌患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组36例。对照组单纯使用SOX方案化疗,治疗组在SOX化疗方案的基础上加用藿苏养胃口服液。两组均以21 d为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程,观察临床疗效及不良反应的发生情况,比较中医证候积分、癌症患者生命质量测定量表(EORTC QLQ-C30)评分的变化情况。,结果,2,①试验过程中治疗组脱落2例、对照组脱落1例,最终完成试验者69例,其中治疗组34例、对照组35例。②治疗组、对照组总有效率分别为64.71%、14.29%,治疗组临床疗效优于对照组。③治疗前后组内比较,治疗组中医证候积分减少(,P,<,0.05),对照组中医证候积分差异无统计学意义(,P,>,0.05);组间治疗前后中医证候积分差值比较,差异有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05)。④在EORTC QLQ-C30量表评分方面,治疗组疲劳、恶心呕吐、食欲丧失领域评分的改善情况优于对照组(,P,<,0.05)。⑤治疗组、对照组贫血发生率分别为47.06%、71.43%,恶心呕吐发生率分别为8.82%、54.29%;两组化疗后贫血及恶心呕吐发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(,P,<,0.05)。,结论,2,与单纯采用SOX化疗方案相比,联合使用藿苏养胃口服液治疗晚期胃癌疗效满意,能更好地改善患者的临床症状,提高生存质量,降低化疗药物不良反应(贫血、恶心呕吐)发生率。
Objective,2,To observe the clinical effect of Huosu Yangwei Syrup combined with SOX chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).,Methods,2,A total of 72 AGC patients were randomly divided into treatment group (,n,=36) and control group (,n,=36). The control group was administered with SOX chemotherapy regimen alone, while the treatment group was administered with Huosu Yangwei Syrup besides SOX chemotherapy regimen. Both groups were treated for two courses of treatment, with 21 days as one course of treatment. The clinical efficacy and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed. The changes of TCM syndrome scores and the EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores were compared.,Results,2,①During the trial, there were 2 drop-out cases in the treatment group and 1 drop-out case in the control group. A total of 69 patients finally completed the trail, including 34 cases in the treatment group and 35 cases in the control group. ②The total effective rates of the treatment group and the control group were 64.71% and 14.29% respectively, and the clinical efficacy of the treatwent group was significantly better than that of the control group(,P,<,0.05).③According to the intra-group comparison before and after treatment, the TCM syndrome scores in the treatment group decreased after treatment (,P,<,0.05), but there was no significant difference in the TCM syndrome scores in the control group (,P,>,0.05); According to the inter-group comparison before and after treatment, the differences in the TCM syndrome scores were statistically significant (,P,<,0.05). ④The improvement of fatigue, nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite in the treatment group was better than that in the control group (,P,<,0.05) according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores. ⑤The incidence of anemia was 47.06% in the treatment group and 71.43% in the control group, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 8.82% in the treatment group and 54.29% in the control group. There was statistically significant difference in the incidence of anemia, nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy between the two groups (,P,<,0.05).,Conclusion,2,Compared with the single use of SOX chemotherapy regimen, the combined use of Huosu Yangwei Syrup and Sox regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer shows a more satisfactory result, as it can better improve patients’ clinical symptoms and the quality of life, and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions (anemia, nausea and vomiting) of chemotherapeutic drugs.
胃癌晚期藿苏养胃口服液替吉奥奥沙利铂
gastric canceradvanced stageHuosu Yangwei Syruptegafurgimeracil and oteracil potassiumoxaliplatin
白慧霞. 中国胃癌发病率及死亡率研究进展[J]. 临床医药文献杂志,2019, 6(7): 192.
王芸,杨含腾. 含替吉奥化疗方案治疗进展期胃癌的疗效分析[J]. 甘肃科技,2019, 35(11): 141-144.
EMIL T V, HAJ M N, PAUL L, et al. The efficacy and safety of S-1-based regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced gas tric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2016, 19(3): 696-712.
YAMADA Y, HIGUCHI K, NISHIKAWA K, et al. Phase Ⅲ study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(1): 141-148.
AMIN M, EDGE S, GREENE F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual[M]. 8th ed. America: Springer International Publishing, 2017: 203-220.
国家药品监督管理局. 中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M]. 中国医药科技出版社,2002: 124-156.
万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,等. 癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005, 20(4): 353-355.
于世英,胡国清. 肿瘤临床诊疗指南[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2013: 537-541.
左婷婷,郑荣寿,曾红梅,等. 中国胃癌流行病学现状[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2017, 44(1): 52-58.
丁芋友. 健脾益肾汤防治顺铂化疗所致恶心呕吐的临床研究[D]. 成都:成都中医药大学,2014: 51-59.
季漪,吴勉华. 中医药防治恶性肿瘤化疗所致周围神经毒性研究进展[J]. 山东中医杂志,2016, 35(10): 924-926.
叶悟,方盛泉,杨旭明,等. 藿苏养胃口服液对胃癌前病变患者血清胃蛋白酶原影响的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药杂志,2015, 49(5): 41-44.
韩宁,朱生樑,程艳梅. 藿苏养胃口服液治疗气阴不足型慢性萎缩性胃炎的临床疗效评价[J]. 上海中医药大学学报,2013, 27(6): 27-30.
0
浏览量
238
下载量
0
CSCD
4
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构