1. 上海中医药大学基础医学院上海市健康辨识与评估重点实验室,上海,201203
扫 描 看 全 文
许文杰, 胡亮亮, 李媛媛, 等. Framingham心血管不同风险等级人群及冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者舌色特征分析[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2020,54(9):23-26.
XU Wenjie, HU Liangliang, LI Yuanyuan, et al. Analysis of tongue color parameters of groups with different cardiovascular risk levels in Framingham and patients with coronary heart disease [J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020,54(9):23-26.
许文杰, 胡亮亮, 李媛媛, 等. Framingham心血管不同风险等级人群及冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者舌色特征分析[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2020,54(9):23-26. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2020.2005192.
XU Wenjie, HU Liangliang, LI Yuanyuan, et al. Analysis of tongue color parameters of groups with different cardiovascular risk levels in Framingham and patients with coronary heart disease [J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020,54(9):23-26. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2020.2005192.
目的:探讨Framingham心血管不同风险等级人群及冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(冠心病)患者的舌色特征。 方法:入选冠心病患者240例,体检者286例,根据Framingham风险评分(FRS)将体检者分为10年冠心病风险低危组(n=216例)、中危组(n=55例)和高危组(n=15例),应用中医舌诊仪采集冠心病患者及体检者的舌象,基于RGB、HSV颜色空间对舌色特征进行分析。 结果:低危组舌质颜色G、B、S值与冠心病组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),冠心病组舌质颜色G、B值高于低危组(P<0.05),S值低于低危组(P<0.05);中危组舌质颜色G、S值与低危组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),中危组舌质颜色G值高于低危组(P<0.05),S值低于低危组(P<0.05)。低危组舌尖颜色G、B、S值与冠心病组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),冠心病组舌尖颜色G、B值高于低危组(P<0.05),S值低于低危组(P<0.05);中危组舌尖颜色R、V值低于低危组(P<0.05);冠心病组舌尖颜色R值高于中危组(P<0.05)。 结论:Framingham风险评分10年冠心病风险低危组、中危组、高危组与冠心病患者的舌色特征参数存在差异,提示中医舌诊客观信息在冠心病发病风险预测中有一定的参考价值。
Objective:To explore the tongue color parameters of Framingham cardiovascular risk groups and patients with coronary heart disease.MethodsA total of 240 patients with coronary heart disease were recruited and 286 people for physical examination were collected.According to the Framingham risk score(FRS),physical examination people were divided into 10-year low-risk group(n=216),medium-risk group(n=55)and high-risk group(n=15).TCM tongue diagnosis instrument was used to collect tongue images,and the tongue images were analyzed based on RGB and HSV color space. Results:The tongue color G,B,S values of the low-risk group were statistically different from those of the coronary heart disease group(P<0.05), The G,B values of tongue color in the coronary heart disease group were higher than those in the low-risk group(P<0.05),and the S value was lower than that in the low-risk group(P<0.05);The tongue color G,S values in the middle-risk group were statistically different from those in the low-risk group(P<0.05).The tongue color G value of the middle-risk group was higher than that of the low-risk group(P<0.05),and the S value was lower than that of the low-risk group(P<0.05).The tongue-tip color G,B,S values of the low-risk group were statistically different from those of the coronary heart disease group(P<0.05);The tongue-tip color G,B values of the coronary heart disease group were higher than those of the low-risk group(P<0.05),the tongue-tip color S value in coronary heart disease group was lower than that in low-risk group(P<0.05);The tongue-tip color R,V values in middle-risk group were lower than that in low-risk group(P<0.05);The tongue-tip color R value in coronary heart disease group was higher than that in middle-risk group(P<0.05). Conclusion:There are differences in tongue color parameters in FRS 10-year coronary heart disease low-risk group,middle-risk group,high-risk group and coronary heart disease patients.Tongue diagnosis with a certain reference for predicting the risk of coronary heart disease.
冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病Framingham风险评分舌象舌诊客观化
coronary heart diseaseFramingham risk scoretongue imagetongue diagnosisobjectification
0
浏览量
302
下载量
0
CSCD
6
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构