1. 上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院皮肤科,上海,200437
2. 上海市中医药研究院皮肤病研究所,上海,200437
扫 描 看 全 文
王艳姣, 迮侃, 卢怡, 等. 火针治疗寻常疣的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2020,54(3):82-84.
WANG Yanjiao, ZE Kan, LU Yi, et al. Clinical observation on the treatment of common warts by fire acupuncture[J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020,54(3):82-84.
王艳姣, 迮侃, 卢怡, 等. 火针治疗寻常疣的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2020,54(3):82-84. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2020.03.022.
WANG Yanjiao, ZE Kan, LU Yi, et al. Clinical observation on the treatment of common warts by fire acupuncture[J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020,54(3):82-84. DOI: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2020.03.022.
目的:观察火针治疗寻常疣的临床疗效。 方法:将160例寻常疣患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组80例。对照组采用疣体内局部注射聚肌胞治疗,治疗组采用火针治疗。治疗周期为28 d,观察临床疗效,比较寻常疣自拟综合分级评分、治疗时VAS疼痛评分的变化情况,同时评价安全性。 结果:①试验过程中,治疗组脱落3例,对照组脱落6例,最终完成试验者151例,其中治疗组77例,对照组74例。②治疗组总有效率97.4%,对照组总有效率73.0%;两组临床疗效比较,治疗组优于对照组(P<0.05)。③第2次治疗前、第3次治疗前与第1次治疗前组内比较,两组寻常疣自拟综合分级评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);第4次治疗前与第1次治疗前组内比较,两组寻常疣自拟综合分级评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。第2次治疗前、第3次治疗前组间比较,寻常疣自拟综合分级评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);第4次治疗前组间比较,治疗组寻常疣自拟综合分级评分少于对照组(P<0.05)。④第1次治疗时组间比较,VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);第2次治疗、第3次治疗、第4次治疗时组间比较,治疗组治疗时VAS疼痛评分少于对照组(P<0.05)。⑤试验过程中,两组均未见明显不良反应。 结论:火针治疗寻常疣疗效满意,与聚肌胞注射疗法相比,能更好地改善患者的临床症状,且治疗时疼痛小,安全性好,值得临床进一步推广应用。
Objective:To observe the clinical effect of fire acupuncture on common warts. MethodsRandomly divide 160 cases of common wart patientsA total of 160 cases of common wart patients were randomly divded into the treatment group and the control group, with 80 cases in each group. The control group was treated by local injection of myocellular cellspoly-myocyte in wart body, while the treatment group was treated by fire acupuncture. The treatment course was 28 days, and the clinical efficacy was observed. The changes of VAS pain score during treatment and the self-designed comprehensive grading score for common warts were compared, and the safety was also evaluated. Results:①In the process of the experiment, 3 cases in the fire acupuncturetreatment group and 6 cases in the poly myocytecontrol group dropped out, and 151 cases were collected including 77 cases in the fire acupuncturetreatment group and 74 cases in the poly myocytecontrol group.②The total effective rate of the fire acupuncturetreatment group was 97.4%, and that of Poly I-Cthe control group was 73.0%. Compared with the two groups, the fire acupuncturetreatment group showed better clinical effects than the Poly I-Ccontrol group (P<0.05). ③Compared before the second treatment, before the third treatment and before the first treatment respectively, both groups had no significant difference in the self-designed grading score for common warts (P>0.05). Compared before the fourth treatment and before the first treatment, both groups showed significant differences in the self-designed grading score for common warts (P<0.05). Compared before the second treatment and before the third treatment, both groups showed no significant difference in the self-designed grading score for common warts (P>0.05). Comparison between groups before the fourth treatment showed that the self-designed grading score for common warts in the fire acupuncturetreatment group was lower than that in the Poly I-Ccontrol group (P<0.05).④There was no statistically significant difference in VAS pain score between the groups at the first treatment (P>0.05). The VAS pain score in the fire acupuncturetreatment group was lower than that in the myocellularcontrol group at the second, third and fourth treatment respectively (P<0.05). ⑤No obvious adverse reactions were observed in either group during the experiment. Conclusion:The curative effect of fire acupuncture on common warts is satisfactory. Compared with Poly I-C injection therapy, it can better improve the clinical symptoms of patients with reduced pain and good safety, which is worthy of further clinical promotion and application.
寻常疣火针聚肌胞注射
common wartfire acupuncturepoly I-C injection
0
浏览量
367
下载量
0
CSCD
11
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构