Clinical study of traditional Chinese medicine formula granules on multi-center, randomized controlled and non-inferiority of essential hypertension
|更新时间:2022-08-31
|
Clinical study of traditional Chinese medicine formula granules on multi-center, randomized controlled and non-inferiority of essential hypertension
Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese MedicineVol. 49, Issue 10, Pages: 35-38(2015)
作者机构:
1. 中国中医科学院西苑医院心血管科,北京,100091
2. 北京市中西医结合医院脑病科,北京,100039
3. 北京中医药大学附属第三医院心血管科,北京,100029
4. 北京王府中西医结合医院内分泌科,北京,102209
5. 北京市怀柔区中医院心血管科,北京,101400
6. 北京按摩医院内科,北京,100035
7. 北京市通州区中西医结合骨伤医院内科,北京,101100
8. 北京市房山区中医医院内科,北京,102400
9. 北京市宣武区中医院心血管科,北京,100053
10. 中国中医科学院西苑医院临床药理研究所,北京,100091
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
扫 描 看 全 文
ZHONG Jing-bai, FENG Xue-gong, LU Wei-xing, et al. Clinical study of traditional Chinese medicine formula granules on multi-center, randomized controlled and non-inferiority of essential hypertension. [J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 49(10):35-38(2015)
DOI:
ZHONG Jing-bai, FENG Xue-gong, LU Wei-xing, et al. Clinical study of traditional Chinese medicine formula granules on multi-center, randomized controlled and non-inferiority of essential hypertension. [J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 49(10):35-38(2015)DOI:
Clinical study of traditional Chinese medicine formula granules on multi-center, randomized controlled and non-inferiority of essential hypertension
Objective:To investigate the effect and safety of traditional Chinese medicine formula granules (FG) and Chinese Herbs Pieces (CHP) on grade 1-2 hypertension patients Methods:227 cases were divided into treatment group (116 cases) and control group (111 cases) , the cases in treatment group were treated with traditional Chinese medicine formula granules (Compound radix scutellariae Decoction or Compound Xianmai Decoction ) while the case of control group were treated with traditional Chinese medicine slice decoction(Compound radix scutellariae Decoction or Compound Xianmai Decoction ), 1 month for each group. SBP, DBP, rate of reaching blood pressure standard, TCM syndrome score and drug safety were observed. 26 cases were rejected. The course was 4 weeks. Clinic average decline in blood pressure, rate of reaching blood pressure standard, TCM syndrome score efficacy and difference of adverse events of the two groups were analyzed by the method of non-inferiority test Results:①During the test, there were 225 case accord with FAS and in which 115 case in treatment group and 110 cases in control group; there were 201 case accord to PPS and in which 99 case in treatment group and 102 case in control group. ②In FAS and PPS, compared in each group before and after the treatment, there were statistical significance in the differences of SBP and DBP(P<0.05), but there was no statistical significance in the differences of SBP and DBP between the two groups(P>0.05), and non-inferiority test was established . ③There was no statistical significance in the differences of rates of reaching blood pressure standard between the two groups(P>0.05). ④There was no statistical significance in the differences of TCM syndrome score between the two groups(P>0.05). ⑤There was no statistical significance in the differences of adverse events between the two groups(P>0.05) Conclusion:The effect of traditional Chinese medicine formula granules on grade 1-2 hypertension patients was not worse than that of traditional Chinese medicine slice decoction.
关键词
原发性高血压中药配方颗粒中药饮片复方黄芩汤复方仙麦汤
Keywords
essential hypertensionChinese medicine formula granulestraditional Chinese medicine slice decoctioncompound radix scutellariae decoctioncompound Xianmai decoction